ISSN (print) - 0131-7652

ISSN (online) - 2686-7605

Том 52 № 6 (2022)
ДИСКУССИОННЫЙ КЛУБ

Поведенческий империализм и три стадии развития поведенческой экономики

PDF
  • А.А. Управителев
А.А. Управителев
Санкт-Петербургский государственный университет, Санкт-Петербург
DOI: https://doi.org/10.30680/ECO0131-7652-2022-6-67-88

Опубликован 27.05.2022

Ключевые слова

  • поведенческая экономика; экономическая методология; ограниченная рациональность; теория перспектив; поведенческий патернализм

Как цитировать

1.
Управителев А. Поведенческий империализм и три стадии развития поведенческой экономики. ECO [Интернет]. 27 май 2022 г. [цитируется по 20 апрель 2024 г.];52(6):67-88. доступно на: https://ecotrends.ru/index.php/eco/article/view/4448

Аннотация

Поведенческая экономика получила в последние годы значительное развитие. Автор предлагает оригинальную периодизацию этого направления, базирующуюся на методологии научно-исследовательских программ И. Лакатоса. Обосновано выделение трех стадий: в течение первой происходило формирование жёсткого концептуального ядра поведенческой экономики, во время второй (формирование защитного пояса) были созданы ключевые теории поведенческой микро-, макроэкономики и поведенческих финансов. Третья стадия характеризуется обширным проникновением элементов поведенческой экономики в сферу экономической политики и другие социальные дисциплины. По аналогии с экономическим империализмом XX века, основывавшемся на неоклассической теории, предлагается назвать эту экспансию поведенческим империализмом.
PDF

Библиографические ссылки

  1. Гуриев С. М. Три источника – три составные части экономического империализма // Общественные науки и современность. 2008. № 3. С. 134–141.
  2. Управителев А. А. Ежегодная конференция Общества по развитию поведенческой экономики (SABE) // Журнал НЭА. 2020. № 4 (48). C. 229–231.
  3. Allais, М. (1953). Le comportement de l’homme rationnel devant le risque: critique des postulats et axiomes de l’école Américaine. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society. Pp. 503–546.
  4. Angner, E. (2019). We’re all behavioral economists now. Journal of Economic Methodology. No. 26, 3. Pp. 195–207.
  5. Angner, E., Loewenshtein, G. (2006). Behavioral Economics. In Elsevier’s Handbook of the Philosophy of Science. North Holland: Elsivier.
  6. Barberis, N. (2018), Richard Thaler and the Rise of Behavioral Economics. Scand. J. of Economics. No. 120. Pp. 661–684.
  7. Barberis, N., Shleifer, A., Vishny, R. (1998). A model of investor sentiment. Journal of Financial Economics. No. 49, 3. Pp. 307–343.
  8. Benartzi, S., & Thaler, R. H. (1995). Myopic Loss Aversion and the Equity Premium Puzzle. The Quarterly Journal of Economics. No. 110,1. Pp. 73–92.
  9. Benjamin, D., Laibson, D. (2003). Good policies for bad governments: behavioral political economy. Boston Fed Conference on Behavioral Economics Proceedings, 48(Jun).
  10. Blaug, M. (1998). Economic Theory in Retrospect. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  11. Bolton, G.E., Ockenfels, A. (2000). ERC: A Theory of Equity, Reciprocity, and Competition. The American Economic Review. No. 90, 1. Pp. 166–193.
  12. Camerer, C., Issacharoff, S. et al. (2003. Regulation for Conservatives: Behavioral Economics and the Case for ‘Asymmetric Paternalism’. University of Pennsylvania Law Review. (151). Pp. 1211–1254.
  13. Coates, J.M., Herbert, J. (2008). Endogenous Steroids and Financial Risk Taking on a London Trading Floor. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. No. 105, 16. Pp. 6167–6172.
  14. Crockett, M.J., Fehr, E. (2014). Pharmacology of economic and social decision making. In: Neuroeconomics. Vol 2. P. W. Glimcher and E. Fehr (eds.). London: Elsevier Inc. Pp. 257–279.
  15. Dana, J., Lowenstein, G. (2003). A psychological perspective on the influence of gifts to physicians from industry. Journal of the American Medical Association. No. 290, 2. Pp. 252–255.
  16. De Bondt, W., Thaler, R. (1985). Does the Stock Market Overreact? The Journal of Finance. No. 40, 3. Pp. 793–805.
  17. Ekelund, R.B., & Hébert, R.F. (2002). Retrospectives: The Origins of Neoclassical Microeconomics. The Journal of Economic Perspectives. No. 16(3). Pp. 197–215.
  18. Elster, Jon, (1998). Emotions and Economic Theory. Journal of Economic Literature. No. 36, issue 1. Pp. 47–74.
  19. Falk, A., Fischbacher, U. (2006). A theory of reciprocity. Games and Economic Behavior. No. 54, 2. Pp. 293–315.
  20. Fehr, E., Gachter, S. (2000). Cooperation and punishment in public goods experiments, The American Economic Review. No. 90(4). Pp. 980–994.
  21. Fehr, E., Gachter, S. (2000). Fairness and Retaliation: The economics of reciprocity. Journal of Economic Perspectives. No.14, 3. Pp. 159–181.
  22. Fehr, E., Schmidt, K. (1999). A theory of fairness, competition, and cooperation. Quarterly Journal of Economics. No. 114, 3. Pp. 817–868.
  23. Frantz, R. (2020). The “Big 3.” Simon, Katona, Leibenstein. The Beginnings of Behavioral Economics, Academic Press. Pp. 25–45.
  24. Frederick, S., Loewenstein, G., O’Donoghue, T. (2002). Time discounting and time preference: A critical review. Journal of Economic Literature. No. 40, 2. Pp. 351–401.
  25. Geiger, N. (2017).The rise of behavioral economics: a quantitative assessment. Social Science History, (3). Pp. 555–583.
  26. Guriev, S. (2008). The Three Sources and Three Components of Economic Imperialism. Social Sciences and Contemporary World. (3). Pp. 134–141.
  27. Heukelom, F. (2012). The Alfred P. Sloan and Russell Sage Foundations’ Behavioral Economics Program, 1984–1992. Science in Context, 25(2). Pp. 263–286.
  28. Hong, H., Stein, J. (1999). Unified Theory of Underreaction, Momentum Trading and Overreaction in Asset Markets. Journal of Finance. No. 54, 6. Pp. 2143–2184.
  29. Huberman, G., Regev, T. (2001). Contagious Speculation and a Cure for Cancer: a Nonevent that Made StockPrices Soar. Journal of Finance. No. 56, 1. Pp. 387–396.
  30. Jolls, C., Sunstein, C. R., & Thaler, R. (1998). A Behavioral Approach to Law and Economics. Stanford Law Review. No. 50(5). Pp. 1471–1550.
  31. Kahneman, D., Tverski, A. (1979.) Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica. No. 47. Pp. 263–291.
  32. Katona, G. (1951). Psychological analysis of economic behavior. McGraw-Hill.
  33. Kosfeld, M., Heinrichs, M., Zak, P.J, Fischbacher, U., Fehr, E. (2005). Oxytocin increases trust in humans. Nature. No. 435, 7042. Pp. 673–676.
  34. Kőszegi, B., Rabin, M. (2006). A model of reference-dependent preferences. The Quarterly Journal of Economics. No. 121, 4. Pp. 1133–1165.
  35. Laibson, D. (1997). Golden eggs and hyperbolic discounting. Quarterly Journal of Economics. No. 112, 2. Pp. 443–78.
  36. Lakatos, I. (1978). The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes: Philosophical Papers Vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  37. Leibenstein, H. (1950). Bandwagon, Snob, and Veblen Effects in the Theory of Consumers’ Demand. The Quarterly Journal of Economics. No. 64(2). Pp. 183–207.
  38. Loewenstein, G. (1996). Out of control: Visceral influences on behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processe. No. 65, 3. Pp. 272–292.
  39. Loewenstein, G. et al. (2001). Risk as feelings Psychological Bulletin 127(2). Pp. 267–286.
  40. Loewenstein, G., Haisley, E. (2006). The Economist as Therapist: Methodological Ramifications of ‘Light’ Paternalism. in Perspectives on the Future of Economics: Positive and Normative Foundations. The Handbook of Economic Methodologies. Vol. 1. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  41. Merigo, J.M., Rocafort, A. & Aznar-Alarcón, J. (2016). Bibliometric Overview of Business & Economics Research. Journal of Business Economics and Management. No. 17. Pp. 397–413.
  42. Odean, T. (1998). Are Investors Reluctant to Realize Their Losses? Journal of Finance. No. 53, 5. Pp. 1775–1798.
  43. Rabin, M. (1993). Incorporating Fairness into Game Theory and Economics. American Economic Review. No. 83, 5. Pp. 1281–1302.
  44. Rabin, M., (2002). A Perspective on Psychology and Economics. European Economic Review. No. 46(4–5). Pp. 657–685.
  45. Sent, E.-M. (2004). Behavioral Economics: How Psychology Made Its (Limited) Way Back Into Economics. History of Political Economy. No. 36(4).
  46. Pp. 735–760.
  47. Shefrin, H., Statman M. (1985). The Disposition to Sell Winners Too Early and Ride Losers Too Long: Theory and Evidence. Journal of Finance. No. 40, 3. Pp. 777–790.
  48. Simon, H. (1955). A Behavioral Model of Rational Choice. The Quarterly Journal of Economics. Vol. 69, No. 1. Pp. 99–118.
  49. Sunstein, C., Thaler, R. (2003). Libertarian Paternalism Is Not an Oxymoron. University of Chicago Law Review. No. 70, 4. Pp. 1159–1202.
  50. Thaler, R. H. (1999). The End of Behavioral Finance. Financial Analysts Journal. No. 55(6). Pp. 12–17.
  51. Thaler, R., Sunstein, C. (2003). Libertarian Paternalism. American Economic Review. No. 93, 2. Pp. 175–179.
  52. Thaler, R.H. (1999). Mental accounting matters. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making. No. 12. Pp. 183–206.
  53. Thaler, Richard (1980). Toward a positive theory of consumer choice. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization. No. 1, 1. Pp. 39–60.
  54. Thaler, Richard (1985). Mental Accounting and Consumer Choice. Marketing Science. No. 4, issue 3. Pp. 199–214.
  55. Tversky A., Kahneman D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science. No. 185, 4157. Pp. 1124–1131.
  56. Tversky, A., Kahneman, D. (1985). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Behavioral decision making. Springer, Boston, MA. Pp. 25–41.